Hello, guest
|
Name: xXxMOxXx
[ Original Post ]
i was reading a gossip magazine the other day and did any1 hear about the english mother that is 5 months pregnant and she is 62??? what are your veiws on this, is it right or wrong?
Your Name


captcha

Your Reply here


 
Name: Amy | Date: May 16th, 2006 5:25 PM
I think it is sad because the baby or mom put their life at risk. Imagen her when the baby goes on to be a teen. 

Name: Kelly | Date: May 16th, 2006 5:53 PM
I can't be the one to say if it's "right" or "wrong", but I do know I would never make that decision myself. I also watched the program about her, her and her husband are wealthy and the child will be taken care of the rest of his/her life, but still it seems a bit selfish. I feel personally that if you can't have a baby w/out the use of fertility treatments, maybe you weren't meant to have a baby period. 

Name: sally | Date: May 16th, 2006 6:36 PM
You hit the nail on the head Kelly. I agree 100% 

Name: Angela1 | Date: May 16th, 2006 6:43 PM
I agree to a point. I due think it is a bit selfish to have a child when you are so old. But what you said about the fertility medicine I dont agree! Having a baby is a huge gift. And being a woman if you want to have a baby and experience the joy of having a baby and giving the gift of life then you should be able to. And if you need a little help than you should thank god that it is out there for those woman. I love being a mother and I loved being pregnant and giving birth. Every woman should be able to experience that if they want. Just my opinion. And we are all intitled to our own!! Have a GREAT day ladies!! 

Name: Sally | Date: May 16th, 2006 7:20 PM
Yeah Angela good point. I meant to say that i agree with Kelly 100% but i did misunterstand the post a little bit and have now just re read through it and i do agree with ivf for some ppl but not after menopause. 

Name: sonia | Date: May 16th, 2006 7:32 PM
I can't understand why this would be selfish. I haven't seen the program but it seems to me that if you are healthy and can provide for the child why not? Most of us are in our twenties and think 62 is old but I have known some 62 year olds that are healthier and more energetic than some of us. 


Name: Angela1 | Date: May 16th, 2006 8:55 PM
The only reason why I think it is a little selfish is that that child is going to loose his/her parents at a very young age. There is a good chance they wont be around to see him/her graduate. But it is amazing and great for the couple who have decided to have a baby at that age. I hope everything is well. And who am I to judge. I am sure they will be a very happy family. 

Name: amy | Date: May 16th, 2006 9:35 PM
both 62 and 11 are wrong there bodies cnt handle it can they 

Name: sally | Date: May 16th, 2006 9:55 PM
why it would be selfish is because this woman is never going to get to see her grandchildren or be there for the childs wedding, probably not even their graduation. 

Name: Brandy | Date: May 17th, 2006 1:35 AM
I don't really know what to say about things like this. Very rarely do I ride the fence about things like this but I find myself at a loss for words. 

Name: sonia | Date: May 17th, 2006 5:09 PM
Some of the people in my family didn't die until their late 90's. I think if you live a healthy life there should be no problems. My husband is twenty years older than me and he will be in his fifties when we have our last child. He seems as young and energetic as me, sometimes more so. 

Name: ............. | Date: May 17th, 2006 7:47 PM
i know 62 is kinda to old because when the baby gets 20 the mother will be 82 but thinking of kids these day that are left at a young age from there parents dieing young i guess its the same both ways being old and dieing leaving a small child or dieing youngand leaving a small child 

Copyright 2024© babycrowd.com. All rights reserved.
Contact Us | About Us | Browse Journals | Forums | Advertise With Us