No, that troll post wasn't made by me. I did try to change my name once to humptydumpty, but it was short lived and just plain uncomfortable to switch back and forth. How are you doing in there? Come out, nobody will bite you. Is it fun to always read but never post? ↓
|
|
Well if i was to guess it was anyone who did that post, it would be you.
Your the only one ive seen use the same words, grammer and spelling is A+ everything written out was carefully done, and with intellegence.
I'm not accusing you...but you would be a top 5 contender for the SAHM person! ↑ |
No, bunny, that wasn't me. And who do you think the other 4 contenders are? ↑ |
i have 4 guesses and sorry E one was you for the same reason as bunny....you have lovely grammar and are intelligent
So whoever SAHM is ...i applaud you in your grammar and intelligence..if in my opinion somewhat displaced ↑ |
[Gasp...] Et tu, Marija.
Geez, why would I do that ??? To stop bunny? My method of stopping, as I said before, is to listen and to get interested in a person. ↑ |
*hanging head in shame*
couldnt get past the grammar...but never accused, just thought ↑ |
Yes, grammar shrammar... I am a foreigner! Foreigner are more meticulous in building the language by rules, they are afraid otherwise to get lost LOL. Hence no loose talk (grammmatically).
TO ALL THE PEOPLE OUT THERE - IT WAS NOT ME!!!!
Phew..... ↑ |
truth be told didnt think it was you after the post about ignorant and wanting to be accepted...It sounded too much like a sulky remark. From there on the conversation went too childlike and confusing. ↑ |
E i meant that as a compliment!!
Yes you are a foreigner and you put alot of us who speak, read and write the language to shame. ↑ |
Yep, I did take it as a compliment. Thanks. Just wanted to explain more. ↑ |
the three others being Jeanne, Rain and Wilsavannahsmom
these are just my thoughts. I dont care if its any of the above or none of the above, or if she wants to stay as SAHM it matters nought ↑ |
just as a p.s to my above post
SAHM admitted to being a former / current?? member posting under a different name...i am not accusing anyone of the above of being SAHM ↑ |
Not Rain. She never had the heavy style. She would not be able to stay consistent. Therefore she would never even attempt. ↑ |
actually i crossed her and one other off early in the piece, because of something that sahm said. so i really only have one guess left ↑ |
well spit it out...ER is about to start. ↑ |
Im thinking Lucky in Life ↑ |
its the guessing game again...hahahaha ↑ |
I'm thinking it's Jeanie.
She mentioned a need for a drink.
She may be thinking that I cut her in pieces and that I'm the biggest troll.
Lucky was very perceptive in saying that she may be passive-aggressive. That's what I think Jeanie's tendency is.
Of course, she's meticulous in her language.
She had one other incident when she was talking about a painful matter under another name. ↑ |
I thought of jeanie too. ↑ |
so what about this french deal. ↑ |
My guesses where E, Jeanie, Katie or Atomic
I took katie and atomic off because both have terrible spelling and neither of them seem to have a brain cell between them.
Jeanie i kinda also took off, because when she has said something to me its been smart arsed and no intellegence was used.
The only person ive seen thats actually seen class with there writing was you E.
Either way they wont come forward because yesterday they showed some real true colours, and i dont think that the woman in here would think so highly of this person anymore.
Regardless i dont care that person = Nothing to me
If you gotta get behind another username and hide, you are no better then the dust that accumulates on the inside of my eye :) ↑ |
yep my bets on jeanne too ...Rain and Wilsavanah i crossed off because she speaks as if we have conversed before and to my knowledge i havent with the other two..(not that i have much with jeanne either) but i get the distinct feeling from the posts, that its someone who still posts here ↑ |
thats fantastic analogy there 13itchy...lol
i refuse point blank to be the dust in your eye or anywhere else on your person....eeeeewwww! ↑ |
And this SAHM fruitloop...there intentions wernt to try and shut me up, it was a pathetic attempt to prove that i was exactly what there post diplicted. Why? i dont know considering you all know what im like! ↑ |
Name: SAHM • Date: 11/15/2006 21:31:49
Thanks for reading it. I've been a member of the board here for a long time. I was one of the first to leave over a month ago. I haven't been back until early this morning beause I love this place.
***************
If I ever left, it was for a day. Those who left a month ago were... ↑ |
who ever it is i guess we can thank them for one thing...being we have a new mystery. ↑ |
Name: SAHM • Date: 11/15/2006 21:09:11
I am one of those who is afraid to post such a thing using my real name. I really wanted to say it and thought this much easier. Anyone can ridicule or slander me and they don't know who it is. I feel better that way.
*******************
Was I ever afraid to post what I think, under my own ame? ↑ |
Name: E • Date: 11/15/2006 21:43:31
It's pretty cool:
The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
*************
This is to show the time that I was online at the same time SAHM discussion was going. This is "Question about Ebay" topic. ↑ |
My boob really hurts :(
i thought i would share that with you ALL! and its not really my boob its my friggen nipple i knew i shouldnt of gotten it periced in a drunken frenzy!!!!! ↑ |
Name: E • Date: 11/15/2006 21:43:31 was your post
The time made by SAHM was
Name: SAHM • Date: 11/15/2006 21:09:11 and then NOT again until
Name: SAHM • Date: 11/15/2006 21:31:49
Thats well over 10 minutes passed between posts, you could of easily signed in and out in that time, hell! i could of even done it with my crappy dial up.
Sorry posting that E proved nothing my dear ↑ |
OK, bunny, think what you want. You haven't been here for long and missed some pieces of history of this forum. I can't fill you in, Iwed have to go through a lot of info. But you don't see the depth. You are taking everything very shallow. ↑ |
|
|